Further Elaboration on Social Security Disability System



In response to Christine Michaels’ recent rebuttal of my article on the dysfunctional  Social Security Disability system, I would like to add several clarifications. Firstly, I did do not believe all mental health patients are scamming the system. Certainly, there are chronically ill individuals who cannot function normally no matter the treatments they receive. Perhaps this is the population Ms. Michaels deals with exclusively. However , to suggest she has never seen people “game” the system can only indicate one of two possibilities, and I have just indicated the more benign of the two. Since my article, I have heard from physicians, nurses, social workers, and, yes, some attorneys whose feedback has been a throaty “Right on! It’s about time someone gave voice to this issue.” One nurse who worked extensively with the chronically mentally ill in the hospital setting, where patients would be expected to be most impaired, estimated that perhaps 20% of this population are truly disabled from working.  Dr. Bastiaens, in his recent Letter to the Editor in the Post-Gazette, concurs that appropriate evaluations for mental disability are not currently being done. Most responses I have received have witnessed and confirmed the unacceptable abuse of this program.     


Several of those who rebutted my views insisted that recipients of Social Security Disability are regularly reevaluated to ensure that they continue to require disability funding. Yesterday I queried (only) 3 of my patients who are on Social Security Disability. Two of them, beneficiaries for the past 4 years, looked at me quizzically, unable to even comprehend the concept of reevaluation, which they had in fact never had heard of. The third, on Social Security Disability for 20 years, was last re-evaluated 3 years ago. The Social Security Disability system is simply not assertive enough or sensitive enough to detect those many who are receiving and continue to receive this entitlement inappropriately. If they do not have the tools to carry out their mandate properly, perhaps they should not do it at all.


Thirdly, at the risk of being accused of ad hominem argumentation, I would like to note that I have encountered but four responses which were not fully pleased with my arguments. Two of these were from lawyers whose sole income stems from getting people onto Social Security Disability. The airwaves are plastered with their commercials. Indeed, it is my understanding that these attorneys receive a full 25% of the “disability” benefits awarded to their clients. Thus, the Social Security Disability system has also managed to generate and to support a secondary industry which funnels a large chunk of its monies to lawyers! A third negative response was from Christine Michaels of NAMI, who may be well intentioned, but who may not be dealing with the same populations I treat, or who may be overly identified with her clients. The fourth response, on Facebook, was from a Bipolar woman who  sounds sincerely chronically impaired and in genuine need of financial help, which I would actively support. I would like,however,  to underline that I am a physician: I have no financial or other interest in this issue other than the health of my patients, as well as the natural concern as a citizen that our public monies be monitored extremely  meticulously and spent only on which yields  value.





On another note, I would like to cite the report of two individuals who contacted me to raise related issues I had not considered. One, a psychiatric nurse, herself a former disability recipient for a medical injury, railed on about her conviction that the Social Security Disability system is invested in fostering dependence. They helped her lose her self-confidence, and she doubted her ability to ever function again.  Recognizing this, she wisely pulled herself up by her bootstraps and forced herself to return to work in order to re-develop her self-assuredness and to escape the clutches of the system. She couldn’t get away fast enough. She now works full time as a clinic director. A gentleman from Pittsburgh concurred. In relation to the effects of Social Security Disability he writes, “Most tragic is the sapping of the spirit of the individuals who trade away their personal pride and feeling of self worth-and ultimately their self-confidence. The sum of those who are weakened and corrupted is paid for in our broader culture and demonstrated most in our daily lives. What we are experiencing is a new version of the adage “power corrupts”-not by threat … but by seduction. What you have described so eloquently is not a matter of bureaucratic sloth or incompetence, but rather a considered plan by government to make people dependent on it and its politicians and bureaucrats, resulting in increased power for them...Your piece is one that should be read by a much larger audience than those who see P-G. My hope is that one of the national news services will pick it up and make it available to a national audience.”



Lastly, the focus of my arguments is primarily on the Social Security Disability system itself and only secondarily on the clients who misuse the system. If the system is flawed and open to abuse, it will naturally encourage a large population of individuals to take advantage of this "path of least resistance." While I do not believe that the Social Security Disability system is the most important problem on the list of current national priorities, I would surmise that it serves as a microcosm for many Federal programs which do not purchase “value” and which have not attended sufficiently to their unintended destructive consequences.  Witness the recent reports from Iliinois, Wisconsin, and Indiana, among other  states, that the government has overpaid fourteen billion dollars in unemployment claims to people who quit work voluntarily, those who have already returned to work, and to prisoners! American citizens, no matter which party affiliation, need to demand loudly that such spending programs be intelligently overhauled until they are buying only  that which is of “value,” or extirpated entirely from the Federal budget.




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        C.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

                                                                                                Dreams I had a dream one week ago. In it, I had returned to medical school at NYU as an adult. It was the first week of classes. The first course, taking up the first half of the week, was in hypertension. I was sitting in the second course, on rehabilitative medicine, next to a student I had been jealous of 45 years ago. He suddenly put on his baseball cap, and cracked a joke which made me laugh even in the dream. He said he needed to look good for the nuns who had just into the back of the classroom. I remarked to myself how very clever and smart he really was, unlike the negative attitude I'd had for him previously. After class, I walked in th...
Read more
                                          How a Physicist Helped Create a Psychiatrist I was anxious as an adolescent. I was 15 years old and had no idea what I was going to become in the future. In truth, I had some suspicions, but these were dreams and did not seem likely to come to fruition, ever. Moreover, my older brother, 2 1/2 years my elder, was already an accomplished scientist, as it were. He had spent many years learning chemistry on his own, and  had already taught chemistry to his high school class as a kind of adjunct teacher on weekends. His career path was already in cement. I, on the other hand ,had no future guideposts to speak of. One particularly anxious evening, I went to see my brother in his garret bedroom. He and I were quite...
Read more
The Arc of Psychotherapy: What is Personality? What Are Personality Disorders? Most people are not familiar with the process of psychotherapy. To non-professionals, psychotherapy may look like a lot of hocus pocus with little clarity or focus. Because of this I thought it would be useful to publish a series of case studies in several therapies that I've been privileged to perform. I will outline, in clear and concise detail, the specific problem which generated the therapy, the treatment course(the "arc"of therapy), and the therapeutic outcomes.  I  will comment on some of the theory and techniques employed in psychotherapy. I hope, thereby, to demystify an otherwise arcane process, and to demonstrate how it can lead to important changes in thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. But first, some basic understanding of the underlying biology of personality. We are all born with differing temperaments. When I was a medical student at NYU, our attending, not a psychiatr...
Read more